Total Pageviews

Monday, October 24, 2016

Year end 2016: Futuristic Poetic Expression

A Racketeering Example?
A North Carolina case of Extortion?
A Georgia to North Carolina Extradition?
A Georgia Release of an Ex-offender.
A Georgia Judgeship Expires.
Movie Reel, TV Deal, A Smiling facial Expression.
A North Carolina Advocate Exhales.

Poem by Benita Blocker.
Prayers to the Universe.

Monday, October 17, 2016

Georgia Racketeering Reaches North Carolina

Photo credit:  www.mastegg.com


To the Georgia clowns that orchestrated the heist on my business banking account, I was anticipating some backlash, but you all became overachievers!  Too bad you failed to use your law degrees to actually practice "good" and "ethical" law.

Actually, your racketeering skills are getting so good that Coastal Federal Credit Union and BB&T Bank are probably just figuring out that they got played.

  • Why would BB&T jeopardize a 15 year old business account relationship to collect $2000.00 for a "credit card debt" from another "bank?"
  • What ethical judge would even sign off on the "writ of execution" on a business account? 
  • Why would Coastal Federal Credit Union open up a window of scrutiny surrounding legalized loan sharking while barely collecting 5% of the total levy?

It would have been smarter for Coastal Federal Credit Union to hit four $500.00 personal accounts than to hit one $2000.00 business account.

In addition, why would anyone attempt to to halt business operations when they still need the business owner to pay them back?

The bank levy/writ of execution was always personal; never business.

The flags were waving to both Coastal Federal Credit Union and to Branch Banking and Trust Company before the levy money was seized.

Clearly, most bank levies are not solely from the sheriff's office like the one that was used to heist my account.  The FBI should start with the judge that signed off on the writ.  I am quite sure that all trails lead to Georgia.

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Coastal Federal Credit Union took my mortgage money from BB&T Bank!



  • Are Financial institutions now Legalized "Loan sharks?"
  • Are credit cards a trap?
  • Are unsecured credit cards really unsecured? 
  • Is your money really under your control in a bank or a credit union?
  • Is there a code of ethics associated with the banks and credit unions' debt collection process?
  • Isn't it easier for banks and credit unions to maintain "fake accounts" versus retain "real accounts?"



Legalized "Loan Shark" Coastal Federal Credit Union instructed the sheriff to:

" . . .  do hereby levy upon Any and all accounts and or assets found at your institution up to, but not to exceed $44,171.01."
Principal: $20,921.23
Interest:  $18,252.06
Court Cost: $ 3,908.18
Other Cost: $ 1029.54
Total DUE:  $44,171.01

Nine years of compounding interest and fees can really add up 
on an unsecured CREDIT CARD in default!



So Coastal Federal Credit Union attorneys "coincidently" levies on my business banking account at the beginining of the month just before my mortgage check is scheduled to clear. BB&T Bank repeatedly returns the mortgage check even though my posted balance is high enough to clear the mortgage.

Notice that the Administrative Hold is for $44,296.01?  Well, BB&T Bank charges $125.00 to extort me out of all of my money. So $44,171.01 + $125.00 = $44,296.01

I have been an accountholder with Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) Bank for over a decade. I would have appreciated a phone call or at least, received a notice in my online banking inbox about the levy against my account.
However, as you can see, BB&T did NOT attempt to personally notify me through my online banking inbox of the Coastal Federal Credit Union's levy against my business banking account. My last inbox message from BB and T Bank was from March 2016.

Actually, BB&T Bank just casually dropped me a letter in the US Postal Mail.  It was NOT certified, and it was delayed in arriving to me.

The Branch Banking and Trust Company letter essentially says that
  • We are taking all your money out of your account.
  • We are taking all additional deposits that you make to your account.
  • We are charging you a non-refundable fee of $125.00 onto your account
  • and call us if we can be of further assistance!
With this kind of customer service surrounding "real accounts," I hope that BB&T doesn't have any "fake accounts."

So what type of customer was I?  My business account was very dynamic.  It had its "highs and lows."

For instance, I was two cents ($.02) SHORT, and BB&T charged me a $36.00 overdraft fee.  I did not even complain.  I did not even ask for a credit nor refund.
Notice my posted balance is negative $36.02?  I was two cents short plus short their $36.00 overdraft fee for a total of -$36.02.  This is how BB&T bank does business.

Also, notice my posted balance on 10/7/2016 was $1,989.35 while my posted balance on 10/5/2016 was $1,474.35. So again, my business account was revolving with deposits and withdraws.

So now, my account has been levied for $2,114.35 which is MORE than my posted balance.


And my new BB&T account balance is still in the negative.  -$197.00 
Well, that's better than the -$42K!!!

Is this all legal?  I am asking the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the National Credit Union Administration  (NCUA) each this very question.

These "loan sharks" ( I mean) bank and credit union seem to be more ruthless the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  At least, the IRS never takes one's last dime.  They leave a little money for people to live with. Why don't banks and credit unions follow the same courtesy or rules?









Monday, October 10, 2016

J. Randal Hall Denies Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

Schmitt versus Reimer et al (cv 110-102)

Judge J. Randal Hall denied Mark Schmitt's emergency motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on September 14, 2010. Footnote 3 states " For instance, the Court notes that Judge Craig has asserted the defense of judicial immunity, which may serve as a complete bar to all claims against him. "

My layman's understanding is that Judge Craig contended that he was virtually and literally "untouchable" in 2010. 

He is due for re-election for another 8 year term this year (2016.)  He is running uncontested.  Surely, God will not let this happen.

I have been told by a few people that the FBI and US Marshalls have overlooked accusations surrounding Judge Craig countless times. Some are in disbelief that he is still in power.

The #exonerateMichael campaign has focused on Judge Daniel Craig because he was the District Attorney responsible for the false imprisonment of Michael C. Blocker.  

I suspect that Judge Daniel Craig influenced another North Carolina judge to make me a "pet project."  I have not secured the name of the local NC judge that signed off on the writ of execution and the latest series of extortion attempts against my assets.  However, I will count on the FBI to finish connecting the dots.

Regardless, if my suspicions are correct or not,  I am making room for a new best friend. (A safe.)

Photo credit:  www.citizenshipper.com






Saturday, October 8, 2016

Coastal Federal Credit Union: Membership does not guarantee Friendship!





BB and T Available Balance: Negative $42,785.66

Most of my associates first responses to my new negative account balance was:
  • Damn!!!
  • Holy Shit!
  • ooooJesus!
  • Wow!
  • "Where did you find that picture?"  (Answer: It is a screenshot of my actual BB and T Banking Account.)
So How did my account become -$42K?


In July 2007, Coastal Federal Credit Union had a judgement filed against me because I became unable to pay a credit card debt.  I regret that my software engineering salary was a thing of the past and now, as a hairdresser in a declining hairdressing market, I was unable to maintain all my financial obligations. I respect Coastal Federal Credit Union's position to protect its members' assets, but they must remember that I am also a member according to their roster. My account is dormant, but I am still a member.

So Coastal Federal Credit Union assigns their attorneys to collect on my $20K+ credit card balance.

This judgement was set to expire at a ten year point around July 2017, but the attorneys turned the judgement into a writ of execution which may extend the collection window to 20 years. I have no problem with this, but here is where the problem comes in:


The original levy (administrative HOLD) on my BB and T bank account on October 3, 2016 was for my EXACT posted balance plus an extra $125. ($1,005.72 +$125 = $1,030.72)

So apparently, someone at BB and T bank was providing my private and personal banking information to conspire and to extort me out of all of my monies in my account. Otherwise, in my opinion, the first documented levy amount should have been independent of my balance.



Further proof that the original levy was not $44,296.01 was because on October 4, 2016, a routine draft from American Express cleared my bank account for around $18.62 and a BB and T $36 Overdraft fee was applied.

However, at some time on October 4, 2016, the bank levy changed from $1,130.72 to $44,296.01.

BB and T Bank owes me some answers.  They have been very courteous this week in refunding some of the return and overdraft fees, and I anticipate that they will investigate this complaint as soon as possible.

In addition, the IRS never "takes people's last penny" out of their account so how can a credit card collection effort empty out a bank account?  North Carolina laws require a nine day hold. 10/3/2016 plus 9 days equals 10/12/2016.  However, the $44k levy did not update until 10/4/2016.  So why didn't the pending date adjust with the levy amount to reflect 10/13/16?

I have been overseeing the #exonerateMichael campaign to free my first cousin from false imprisonment in Georgia.  The circle of judges and attorneys in Augusta, GA that I have identified as showing prosecutorial misconduct have been accused of getting people fired, blackballed, and evicted for crossing paths with them.  

Do I believe that my prison reform effort in Augusta, Georgia has anything to do with this vicious attack on my business banking account?  

Well, you tell me.







Thursday, September 15, 2016

Judge Daniel J. Craig: Forever Entitled to Absolute Judicial Immunity?


"Judge Craig contends that he is entitled to absolute Judicial immunity as to those claims that arise entirely from his conduct as a judicial officer . . . ."


Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall  
for case CV 110-102


"But nothing can compare with the loss of the relationship I had with my only-child-Adrianna. Adrianna was only 6 when I was forced to litigate 2 Federal Lawsuits from South Carolina in 2010."

"My ex-wife's attorney charged me nearly $43,000 for a so called no fault Georgia divorce and for an attorney that I didn't hire.  I paid nearly  $90,000 for several different attorneys, private detectives, and appeal attempts in just the divorce case. And when the dust settled, my only child (now 12) was kidnapped (judicially and maternally) and thus prevented from any contact, a 28 year ATC career destroyed, and assets and income of over 1 million dollars were either stolen and/or destroyed."

Mark Schmitt, Pro Se Plaintiff  (Notified over 500 attorneys for help and got no takers.)

********

 I say Augusta, GA can not afford eight more years of this circle of power and oppression. Over a decade in power has been long enough.  Change has to come.

Please help all the families who are suffering under the corruption in Augusta, GA.

You can start by signing this online petition to #exonerateMichael.  Thank you.

https://www.change.org/p/nathan-deal-hold-widely-respected-judge-danny-craig-accountable-for-framing-michael-c-blocker?recruiter=532225508&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink


Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Non-violent offender gets Lockdown in Augusta, GA Jail



"If you recall, she stated that Michael was placed on lockdown and would not be able to have visitors until Tuesday when he was released from lockdown. Michael wanted to make sure that his dad did not show up for visitation unnecessarily."

Based on this April 27, 2007 letter from the PRIVATE Attorney that the Blocker Family hired, Michael C. Blocker was on lockdown at the Augusta, GA jail despite the DNA Report only confirming his presence as a burglar.  Michael was never a "monster."  Both private attorney and public defender never described Michael as violent.  There was never any proof of violence in this case except how the Richmond County jail, Richmond County Court System, and the Georgia Prison System has subjected Michael C. Blocker to unfair and unconstitutional treatment due to gross prosecutorial misconduct and racketeering.

The personal lockdown in 2007 and the 2016 prison facility lockdown wreaked havoc on Michael Blocker mentally, but he relies on his Christian faith as a Jehovah Witness to weather this storm.

Michael C. Blocker filed a complaint in 2007 with the Georgia Bar surrounding the inadequate law services provided by this private attorney.  The Georgia State Bar was unable to satisfactorily settle Michael C. Blocker's grievance.

"I further informed you that my fee to try this case would be in the $30,000.00 to $50,0000.00 range and that was an amount that you could not afford."

Since when goes a burglary case cost $30k to $50k?  If he had that kind of disposable money, then he would not be a burglar is just my guess.

So everybody is always quick to say - get a private attorney . . .   well, here is proof of what hiring a private attorney gets you in some cases  . . . NOWHERE!!!

#exonerateMichael

A non-violent offender should NOT be sentenced to life without parole.  This false imprisonment at the Georgia State level is unconstitutional.

Please sign his online petition: