Did Presiding Judge oversee constitutional rights stolen?

The presiding judge admitted that Mr. Blocker's alleged rape charge could carry a LIFE sentence which makes case 2007RCCR 00181 a CAPITAL FELONY case.  

Also, according to Code section 17-7-95 - a capital felony - a nolo contendere is unlawful.

Mr. Blocker was detained in jail for a whole year waiting for a FAIR TRIAL by Jury.  His day finally came.  The Jury was charged and his trial went into day three.

Public Defender Hugh Hadden confirms three days of trial. "I think what we must have done is pick the jury on Monday which would have been February 14th."  Where are those "trial transcripts" anyway?  NO ONE seems to KNOW!  BECAUSE the trial began January 14, 2008.  Does anyone care anything about facts, law, and constitutional rights?

So, on the third day of trial, Mr. Blocker who admits to being medicated as noted in his sentencing transcript, was tricked into signing what he understood as a plea deal for burglary by MULTIPLE Public Defenders PRESENT besides Hugh Hadden.

So all of these licensed attorneys including the judge watched a man facing a CAPITAL Felony have his CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to a FAIR TRIAL by JURY STOLEN.  These practicing attorneys INTERFERED with the Due process of LAW (Fifth Amendment) in the middle of a FAIR TRIAL by JURY in a Capital Felony case?

This INJUSTICE needs to be corrected as soon as possible AND those responsible should be formally corrected.

#exonerateMichael

The Hugh Hadden Finesse: Ethical or not?

As the movie "If Beale Street Could Talk" stated, many false imprisoned have taken guilty pleas for crimes that they did not commit because the system wears them down.

Michael Blocker missed his bond hearing because the PAID Private attorney failed to show.

Michael Blocker had been shackled and medicated as if he was a "monster."

Michael Blocker had been sitting a whole year in jail hoping that the trial by jury would set him free.

Meanwhile Michael Blocker's Public Defender Hugh Hadden knew that the State was going for Life Without Parole per Ashley Wright's email (pictured).

Even in the guilty plea hearing where Michael Blocker
1) was under the impression that he had signed for burglary only.
2) stated that he was medicated from the drugs that the jail had been giving him.
3) was tired, sleepy, and exhausted from his entrapment.

Michael Blocker needed ETHICAL counsel.

The COURT: Do you understand that if you plead guilty to the offenses of burglary, rape and kidnapping that under the code section 17-10-7, I think is what you're pleading under, that burglary carries one to twenty years, the kidnapping carries one to twenty and the rape carries ten to twenty to life.  Do you understand?

HOW CAN ANYONE understand when the judge himself is injecting "I THINK you are pleading under code section 17-10-7" especially when the defendant is already been drugged and drowsy?

Why does the court explain the rape sentencing as "10 to 20 to life?" Why not just state from 10 to Life? Was the judge trying to downplay the State's true intentions to sentence Michael Blocker to Life without Parole?

Furthermore, Public Defender Hugh Hadden  KNOWINGLY allowed his "handicap" and "drugged" client Michael Blocker plea into a "ONE WAY TICKET" to prison.

Future clients should watch out for that Hugh Hadden Finesse . . . a NOLO CONTENDRE plea for LWOP is just Unethical.

The State was losing the Trial by Jury so they "Baited with Burglary"only on day three to obtain a signature from a drowsy defendant for a guilty plea only to add the additional charges to the paperwork.

Michael Blocker could have signed a Guilty plea a year prior, but he waited a year for his trial by jury only to have the State drug him and STEAL his CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS from him.

#EXONERATEMICHAEL

Public Defender Hugh Hadden Admissions (10-cv-2368)

Hugh Hadden states "I had no difficulty dealing with Mr. Blocker.  I found him, frankly to be an intelligent young man, very easy-going, and quite pleasant to work with." (HT 16)

Hugh Hadden had been duly sworn during his testimony. (HT 7)

In 2010, Mr. Hadden admitted to handling over a hundred or probably several hundred felony trials. (HT 8)

Mr. Hadden firmly states that DNA evidence placed him (Mr. Blocker) at the scene, but Mr. Hadden implies that he personally has some doubt that Mr. Blocker raped the victim.  So he vaguely mentions that "Mr. Blocker gave two statements to the police that were inculpatory" in order to make him feel better about his implication.

Why? (Because there exists Exculpatory evidence!)

1) There was another person (co-defendant) at the scene. (HT 24)

2) No DNA Expert ever testified  (1:16cv00034)

3) No Rape DNA was ever found. (1:16cv00034)

Mr. Hugh Hadden admits that Mr. Blocker's case drew a good bit of media attention just because of the particular area of town where it occurred.  (HT 14)

Mr. Hadden admits that for lack of a better term, (Mr. Blocker's case) was a high-profile sort of case. (HT 15)

--------- end of Hadden's admissions ------

Let's be clear:

1) Mr. Blocker had a "burglary" background. (The same as many sheriff deputies who "legally steal" on behalf of debt collectors.)

  

2) There was DNA evidence supporting Mr. Blocker being at the scene because of a potential exchange of "stolen goods" IN ORDER to NOT LEAVE ANY FINGERPRINTS. (No fingerprints were found.)

3) Everyone who interacts with Mr. Blocker concludes the same thing . . .

• Intelligent
• Easy-going
• Pleasant

4) There is NO EVIDENCE of ANY VIOLENCE IN THIS CASE (2007-RCCR-0181)

5) If Mr. Blocker did enter a guilty plea knowingly, it was based on the admission of BURGLARY only.  He NEVER admitted to The rape nor Kidnapping charges.   He NEVER signed any paperwork with RAPE nor Kidnapping Charges on it.  

6) There does exist guilty plea paperwork reflecting all three charges with Mr. Blocker's signature; however, THERE IS NO PROOF THAT ALL THREE CHARGES were listed on the paperwork at the time that Mr. Blocker signed the paperwork. (HT 150, HT 151, HT 152, HT 154)


FURTHERMORE,  Isn't it UNLAWFUL to have a NOLO  CONTENDERE Plea for this type of case (2007-RCCR-181) where recividism was also stacked on?  (Hugh Hadden and Ashley Wright signed off -pictured above.) (HT 155)

Hugh Hadden, you failed Mr. Blocker in 2008 case (2007RCCR00181)

and 

you failed Mr. Blocker in 2010 case (10-cv-2368)

That is TWO STRIKES  . . .

I'm preparing documentation for the Georgia Supreme Court . . . I really don't want to see you get a STRIKE THREE for Daniel J. Craig's  2007 grand jury indictment that needs to be dismissed. (Motion to DISMISS is already filed)

Plus, I have a copy of Supreme Court of Georgia Remittitur, Case No. S11H1214 (2011)  (Surely, the Supreme Court would be upset to know about all the negligence and prosecutorial misconduct in these cases.)

That "Rape Culture" Redefined

A Painting outside of the Country Bumpkin store, Waycross, Georgia

Other women have shared their stories with me since sharing my own personal survivor story.  Those stories inspired this article.

Rape Redefined: The Eye Doctor Experience

We give permission for medical professionals to exam us.  We trust them to talk us through their actions.  When that does not happen, the rape feeling is triggered.

For example:  During my own eye exam, the eye doctor opened up my eyes and took both of my contact lenses out in thirty seconds or less in the middle of the exam.  I was mortified.  I usually take out my own contact lenses.  My eyes are very personal to me.  I would have preferred for him to tell me that it was time to remove my contact lenses, and then let me remove them myself.  However, maybe he wanted to save a few minutes and catch me off guard and remove them himself.  You play those tricks with kids and getting them to eat their veggies or to take their medicine.  You don't play those tricks with adults.  This situation may sound trivial to some people, but I was traumatized by this eye doctor removing my contact lenses without telling me that he was going to invade my person and strip me of something personal.

After a heated followup over his actions, I decided to switch to another doctor in his practice.  I am quite certain the notes say "DO NOT REMOVE HER CONTACT LENSES FROM HER EYES WITHOUT PERMISSION." Period.

  

Rape Redefined: Co-worker experiences

Other women have shared with me how co-workers have reached into their cleavage unexpectedly or even being victimized by the Trump's "Grab them by the pu$$y" move.  This is a rape culture.  This is not a touch on the arm.  This is an invasion of a woman's intimacy without permission.  Some women may have unfortunately come from an abusive environment, and they may have gotten used to this type of abuse like the "slave days."  However, for those women who come from a more conservative and sanctified background, these aggressive acts of flirting can be very traumatic with or without "skin to skin" contact.

So where do we go from here?  Education and Respect one another at all times. Set and Respect Boundaries.  People (men/women/other) all have rights to their own personal, private space.