Total Pageviews

Showing posts with label unlawful guilty plea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unlawful guilty plea. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Public Defender Hugh Hadden Admissions (10-cv-2368)

Hugh Hadden states "I had no difficulty dealing with Mr. Blocker.  I found him, frankly to be an intelligent young man, very easy-going, and quite pleasant to work with." (HT 16)


Hugh Hadden had been duly sworn during his testimony. (HT 7)

In 2010, Mr. Hadden admitted to handling over a hundred or probably several hundred felony trials. (HT 8)

Mr. Hadden firmly states that DNA evidence placed him (Mr. Blocker) at the scene, but Mr. Hadden implies that he personally has some doubt that Mr. Blocker raped the victim.  So he vaguely mentions that "Mr. Blocker gave two statements to the police that were inculpatory" in order to make him feel better about his implication.

Why? (Because there exists Exculpatory evidence!)
1) There was another person (co-defendant) at the scene. (HT 24)
2) No DNA Expert ever testified  (1:16cv00034)
3) No Rape DNA was ever found. (1:16cv00034)



Mr. Hugh Hadden admits that Mr. Blocker's case drew a good bit of media attention just because of the particular area of town where it occurred.  (HT 14)


Mr. Hadden admits that for lack of a better term, (Mr. Blocker's case) was a high-profile sort of case. (HT 15)

--------- end of Hadden's admissions ------

Let's be clear:

1) Mr. Blocker had a "burglary" background. (The same as many sheriff deputies who "legally steal" on behalf of debt collectors.)
  
2) There was DNA evidence supporting Mr. Blocker being at the scene because of a potential exchange of "stolen goods" IN ORDER to NOT LEAVE ANY FINGERPRINTS. (No fingerprints were found.)

3) Everyone who interacts with Mr. Blocker concludes the same thing . . .

  • Intelligent
  • Easy-going
  • Pleasant
4) There is NO EVIDENCE of ANY VIOLENCE IN THIS CASE (2007-RCCR-0181)

5) If Mr. Blocker did enter a guilty plea knowingly, it was based on the admission of BURGLARY only.  He NEVER admitted to The rape nor Kidnapping charges.   He NEVER signed any paperwork with RAPE nor Kidnapping Charges on it.  

6) There does exist guilty plea paperwork reflecting all three charges with Mr. Blocker's signature; however, THERE IS NO PROOF THAT ALL THREE CHARGES were listed on the paperwork at the time that Mr. Blocker signed the paperwork. (HT 150, HT 151, HT 152, HT 154)


FURTHERMORE,  Isn't it UNLAWFUL to have a NOLO  CONTENDERE Plea for this type of case (2007-RCCR-181) where recividism was also stacked on?  (Hugh Hadden and Ashley Wright signed off -pictured above.) (HT 155)



Hugh Hadden, you failed Mr. Blocker in 2008 case (2007RCCR00181)
and 
you failed Mr. Blocker in 2010 case (10-cv-2368)

That is TWO STRIKES  . . .

I'm preparing documentation for the Georgia Supreme Court . . . I really don't want to see you get a STRIKE THREE for Daniel J. Craig's  2007 grand jury indictment that needs to be dismissed. (Motion to DISMISS is already filed)

Plus, I have a copy of Supreme Court of Georgia Remittitur, Case No. S11H1214 (2011)  (Surely, the Supreme Court would be upset to know about all the negligence and prosecutorial misconduct in these cases.)

Sunday, April 24, 2016

Paperwork Continues to Support an Unlawful Guilty Plea in Augusta, GA


This letter dated Wednesday, January 30, 2008 says:
Mr. (Hugh) Hadden:
Would you please send me a copy of the plea I signed on the 16th of January as well as some information or what I need to do to try and get my time reduced if possible. 

Sincerely, 
Michael C. Blocker

An associate with Al Sharpton's National Action Network stated to me that after a plea is signed, then the defendant should get their carbon copy of the document immediately.  So for Michael C. Blocker to request a copy of the plea in this letter(above) written after arriving at the prison as well as mentioning in a separate court hearing that he did not remember seeing anything about a life sentence on any paperwork that he signed, continues to support my December 2015 theory that the State altered the guilty plea after Michael C. Blocker signed it.

Since burglary was the first count on the indictment, and burglary was consistently listed first throughout the guilty plea, it is a reasonable assumption to think that the guilty plea only showed twenty years for burglary when Michael C. Blocker signed it.  Then "NO CARBON COPY" was given to him because the "guilty plea" was probably altered after his signature to include a life sentence for rape in which he adamantly denied.  He had sat in jail for a whole year prior to the trial because he refused to plead guilty to rape.

Overmedication, ineffective assistance of counsel, and conspiracy contributed to the false imprisonment of Michael Christopher Blocker.  I started a "change.org" petition that is focused on preventing anyone else from having to suffer excessive sentencing under "a man without mercy," and to release Michael C. Blocker as soon as possible.


#exonerateMichael  

Sunday, April 3, 2016

Three Black Public Defenders Convince Black Defendant to Plead Guilty for Life!

Pictured:  Page 23 of Civil Action, File Number: 2010-CV-2368, Lowndes County, GA


I have confirmed that Michael Christopher Blocker, a Black defendant, was advised by three Black public defenders:
  • Hugh Hadden
  • Tanya Jefffords
  • Alexia Davis

In summary, the news media in the Augusta, Georgia region turned a non-violent burglary case into a high profile rape case based on an elderly, "prominent" White woman's testimony without any rape DNA Match.

Then the Black private attorney asks the Blocker family for $30,000 to $50,000 to continue handling the high-profile case.

Next, the courts hold the Black defendant in jail for a whole year treating him like he was a "guilty monster" even though he adamantly denied the raping and kidnapping the elderly White woman.

Then three Black public defenders convince an overmedicated Black defendant to sign a guilty plea for what he believes is a 20 year sentence for burglary which actually results in a life sentence for rape.

Fast forward to the present . . . the post conviction relief attorneys want an average of $10,000 just to start reviewing the case.



For now, Just Stay Tuned to 
#exonerateMichael
#exonerateMichaelChristopherBlocker



Friday, April 1, 2016

Sentencing Transcript Supports Unlawful Guilty Plea in Augusta, GA


Despite the fact that there was no DNA Match for rape and No evidence of a rape occurring, every authority that I have spoken has referenced Michael C. Blocker's guilty plea and sentencing transcript as proof of guilt.  So let us re-examine the sentencing transcript of Wednesday, January 16, 2008 for unlawfulness.

THE COURT: How far have you gone in school?
THE DEFENDANT: Eleventh grade.
THE COURT: Eleventh grade.
THE DEFENDANT: I got to the eleventh grade.
THE COURT: Do you understand the English language?
THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir

Before I continue with the sentencing transcript details,  let me summarize.  Michael C. Blocker only mentions that he did NOT finish high school, but in reality, he received his G.E.D. in 2003 which was five years prior to this sentencing.  If the COURT would have known of the  G.E.D., then there would have been NO NEED to ask Michael C. Blocker whether he understood the  English language.

THE COURT: Are you under the influence of any drugs, medicine or alcohol today?
THE DEFENDANT: No, sir. I take medication.
THE COURT: Beg your pardon?
THE DEFENDANT: I take medication, but I don't think it influences me.

RED Flag! Medication and the possibility of medications influencing the defendant's decision-making.  Where is the mental health expert?????  Is it wise to proceed with this guilty plea when the defendant is on medication without any medical professional present to clear him for competence to plead guilty?

THE COURT: What kind of medication do you take?
THE DEFENDANT:  
THE COURT: Does that affect you so that you don't understand what's going on?

I am sorry.  Is it wise to ask a man on medication if the medication affects his ability to understand especially when a "life sentence" is on the line?  RED FLAG.  Judge Blanchard Jr.:  Really?  I understand that the presumption of guilt was set in the court's mind, but objectively here, the defendant was NOT competent to plead guilty.




MS. WRIGHT:  Judge, the defendant would need to admit his guilt. There's a lot of if I did it in his statement. He would need to admit that he actually committed these crimes in order for the Court to accept his plea.

Wow! Assistant District Attorney Ashley Wright confirms that Michael C. Blocker NEVER CLEARLY admitted to rape and kidnapping.  Well, amazing!

THE COURT:  But he has pled guilty to the offense. You are pleading guilty to the offense?


Is Judge Blanchard Jr. coaching the defendant here?  Why does Judge Blanchard, Jr. use the word "offense" singular here?  There were three offenses - burglary, rape, and kidnapping STACKED.  The defendant had repeatedly admitted to the burglary; however, Michael C. Blocker adamantly denied both rape and kidnapping charges since the time of arrest.

THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir.
THE COURT:  And you admit that after hearing that testimony that you did it; is that correct?

This line of questioning seems to be Coaching/Leading the defendant into a guilty plea by the judge in my opinion. My goodness.  This is quite fascinating. It would seem that this guilty plea is substantially unlawful in Augusta, Georgia.

In summary:
  • No Rape DNA Match
  • Unlawful Guilty Plea
  • No trial transcripts were ever authorized despite defendant's repeated request.
  • Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
  • Reasonable Doubt
  • Incompetency to plead guilty
  • No proof of violence
  • FALSE IMPRISONMENT
and so on.

#exonerateMichael


COUNSELLORS,  Can you find in your heart to correct this situation by releasing Michael C. Blocker?  It would be greatly appreciated.


Saturday, January 2, 2016

Is Michael C. Blocker under False Imprisonment in Georgia?



Michael C. Blocker is being detained in a Georgia prison based what seems to be an unlawful guilty plea.

The Guilty Plea seems unlawful for the following reasons:

  • The plea was involuntary.
  • The plea was not knowingly.
  • The plea was not intelligently.
  •  Michael C. Blocker states that he was on medications during the trial that began on Tuesday, January 15, 2008.
  •  Michael C. Blocker had ineffective assistance of counsel.
  • AND The trial transcripts are missing!

Since the trial transcripts are missing, prisoner Michael C. Blocker's statements seem just as credible as those who prosecuted him.  He should have been presumed innocent until proven guilty especially since there was NO reported Rape DNA.

Furthermore:

  • The State failed to get a trial conviction.
  • The State can not try Michael C. Blocker again without risk of double jeopardy.
  • The State's primary witness is now deceased without a trial transcript testimony.
Let us also recap recent media coverage of the prosecution team on the Michael C. Blocker "rape case":

Richard Roundtree and Ashley Wright

Richard Roundtree (formerly Sergeant and Prosecutor)

Judge Daniel J. Craig (formerly District Attorney)

Ronnie Strength (formerly Sheriff) and Richard Roundtree (current Sheriff)

District Attorney Ashley Wright (formerly Assistant District Attorney)
NOTE: This article hints at a romantic link to D.A. Ashley Wright.

I digress here.

The bottom line:  
  • Michael C. Blocker was denied a change of venue in spite of his "high profile" case.
  • Michael C. Blocker plead NOT GUILTY.
  • No evidence has been presented to support a "Life Sentence without Parole" (LWOP Sentencing).
  • Michael C. Blocker waited in Richmond County Jail for about a year for a fair trial that was stolen from him.
  • Michael C. Blocker's family was quoted $30,000 to $50,000 by a private attorney to try his case.
  • Michael C. Blocker had ineffective assistance of counsel on multiple habeas corpus filings as well.

This alleged False Imprisonment of Michael C. Blocker should be resolved as soon as possible.

#exonerateMichael