In the case of cv 116-034, Michael Christopher Blocker versus the State (Sam Olens), Judge J. Randal Hall states "A motion for reconsideration should not be used to present arguments already heard and dismissed, or to offer new legal theories or evidence that a party could have presented before the original decision.
My interpretation of J. Randal Hall's statement is: "you can't win!"
D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cv-00113-ACC-PRL
In case 14-14673 (October 21, 2015), an Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of FLORIDA, Judge J. Randal Hall affirms final judgment in favor of the defendants: Gary S. Borders SHERIFF of Lake County, FL and DEPUTY Richard Sylvester. "Death and false imprisonment" were claims brought by the Plaintiffs in this case, but the sheriff gets cleared.
Another "you can't win?"
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01215-VMC-TGW
In case 14-15816 (October 6, 2015), an Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of FLORIDA, Judge J. Randal Hall affirms final judgment in favor of the defendants: SECRETARY, Department of Veteran Affairs. "Employment discrimination and hostile work environment" were claims brought by the Plaintiffs in this case, but the SECRETARY, Department of Veteran Affairs gets cleared.
Another "you can't win?"
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cv-00131-WS-CAS
In case 14-15412 (October 20, 2015), an Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of FLORIDA, Judge J. Randal Hall affirms final judgment in favor of the defendant: Barbara Palmer, Director of the Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities.
Another "you can't win?"
I see a pattern in judgment by Judge J. Randal Hall. Do you?
If you are against the "system" then "You can't win?"
#exonerateMichael in Georgia!
Florida based Photo credits: www.allcourtdata.com
No comments:
Post a Comment