Judge J. Randal Hall displays RACIAL BIAS in DENIAL of Hearing

According  to CV 110-102 Mark Herbert Schmitt v. Susan M. Reimer, et al. Footnote 1 reads:  "While Plaintiff does not identify his motion as an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, based upon the substance of the motion and Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court shall construe it as such."

Mark Schmitt is a White male with 28 years air traffic control experience and a work safety record in the top one percent of any controller.

Judge J. Randal Hall showed leniency based on Schmitt's "pro se" status to hear the motions as presented.

While, Michael Christopher Blocker, a non-violent Black male pro se petitioner with a  G.E.D. who is simply asking for a hearing is DENIED by Judge J. Randal Hall stating in CV 116-034:  Petitioner's motion offers no facts or law at all, much less any "of a strongly convincing nature."  The best that this Court can discern, Petitioner wants this Court to simply change its mind for no reason at all.

NO REASON AT ALL?

Michael Christopher Blocker whose private attorney and public defender both failed to notice that the expedited DNA Report showed no DNA Match for Rape and with Mr. Blocker's limited education, he has toiled to the best of his ability to vacate a life sentence without parole for a crime that he did not commit for the last nine years.

FURTHERMORE:

If Michael Christopher Blocker did not have concrete evidence of gross prosecutorial misconduct surrounding (former A.D.A) Ashley Wright, (former D.A.) Daniel J. Craig, Judge James G. Blanchard, Jr., etc, then a hearing would have already been ordered for "pure entertainment" alone.

However, the Honorable Judge J. Randal Hall continues his pattern to protect the judicial immunity of Judge Daniel J. Craig and associates in his one paragraph order denying Mr. Blocker a hearing that he so deserves based on the very same sentencing transcript that is claimed to be so damaging to his defense.  In reality, the sentencing transcript damages the State more than the defendant.

On a separate note,  Why did it take three months for Judge J. Randal Hall to respond with a one paragraph denial to CV 116-034?  Mr. Blocker's motion for reconsideration asking for another venue as well as a direct response from the Sam Olens, Attorney General, himself was received around 6/28/2016.   Yet, the motion remained pending for three months just for a simple one paragraph denial on 10/5/2016?

If the heist of my bank account was supposed to intimidate me from using my freedom of speech, then you are sadly mistaken.

You all have destroyed the lives of so many families regardless of race, but your biased response to Mr. Blocker's request for a hearing shows an inconsistency in how you construe "Black pro se petitioners" compared to "White pro se plaintiffs."

Maybe the ACLU would be interested in this discriminatory behavior?

#exonerateMichael

Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) Continues to Offend!

So my BB&T balance is STILL negative!  (-$12.00)

They charged me my monthly service fee for the month of October 2016.  For all of the disservice that I have been given this month, I think the $12.00 service fee is a disgrace.

Furthermore, I was told that the fees that were returned to me on 10/21/2016 were a "courtesy" since I called in and appeared in person on 10/17/2016 and asked for credits. My call on 10/17/2016 was to complain about not receiving adequate notice of the levy that was placed on my account.  The representative stated that the State was also to notify me.  I asked why would the State notify me, then she noticed that the levy was not for taxation from the State nor the Feds.  It was "just a levy from the Sheriff's Office."  I asked the branch banker in person for credits, and I was denied.  Then they deposited "$125.00" to cover the non-refundable levy fee and gave me credits for the returned check fees on 10/21/2016.  They also charged their monthly service fee of $12.00. 

 I had my account for 15 years with BB&T, and I sincerely can not tell that the 15 years mean anything to them.

• I explained how this levy took my mortgage money, and the branch banker explains to me how I should have been paying my debts.
• I explained how this levy felt like I was a victim of loan sharking, and the branch banker explains to me that no one has threatened to do any physical injury.
• I explained that I would like the police called so that someone could talk to the Sheriff office about the status of my money, and the branch banker explains to me that I was being selfish and inconsiderate of others because calling the police would result in shutting the bank down and they would lose business.  Why inconvenience others because my account is messed up?

Furthermore, "please feel free to sit in the lobby if you don't have any more questions."

So BB&T takes little to no responsible in destroying my business account and could care less about my 15 years as a member.

Without the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau breathing down their throats, I would have never gotten the credits that  they did give me. So as of 2016, NO, I CAN NOT TELL that BB&T wants my business!!!!  The a$$Hole banker: 

Photo uploaded 5/2018 in order to keep accurate accountability.

Year end 2016: Futuristic Poetic Expression

A Racketeering Example?

A North Carolina case of Extortion?

A Georgia to North Carolina Extradition?

A Georgia Release of an Ex-offender.

A Georgia Judgeship Expires.

Movie Reel, TV Deal, A Smiling facial Expression.

A North Carolina Advocate Exhales.

Poem by Benita Blocker.

Prayers to the Universe.

Georgia Racketeering Reaches North Carolina

Photo credit:  www.mastegg.com

To the Georgia clowns that orchestrated the heist on my business banking account, I was anticipating some backlash, but you all became overachievers!  Too bad you failed to use your law degrees to actually practice "good" and "ethical" law.

Actually, your racketeering skills are getting so good that Coastal Federal Credit Union and BB&T Bank are probably just figuring out that they got played.

• Why would BB&T jeopardize a 15 year old business account relationship to collect $2000.00 for a "credit card debt" from another "bank?"
• What ethical judge would even sign off on the "writ of execution" on a business account? 
• Why would Coastal Federal Credit Union open up a window of scrutiny surrounding legalized loan sharking while barely collecting 5% of the total levy?

It would have been smarter for Coastal Federal Credit Union to hit four $500.00 personal accounts than to hit one $2000.00 business account.

In addition, why would anyone attempt to to halt business operations when they still need the business owner to pay them back?

The bank levy/writ of execution was always personal; never business.

The flags were waving to both Coastal Federal Credit Union and to Branch Banking and Trust Company before the levy money was seized.

Clearly, most bank levies are not solely from the sheriff's office like the one that was used to heist my account.  The FBI should start with the judge that signed off on the writ.  I am quite sure that all trails lead to Georgia.

Coastal Federal Credit Union took my mortgage money from BB&T Bank!

• Are Financial institutions now Legalized "Loan sharks?"
• Are credit cards a trap?
• Are unsecured credit cards really unsecured? 
• Is your money really under your control in a bank or a credit union?
• Is there a code of ethics associated with the banks and credit unions' debt collection process?
• Isn't it easier for banks and credit unions to maintain "fake accounts" versus retain "real accounts?"

Legalized "Loan Shark" Coastal Federal Credit Union instructed the sheriff to:

" . . .  do hereby levy upon Any and all accounts and or assets found at your institution up to, but not to exceed $44,171.01."

Principal: $20,921.23

Interest:  $18,252.06

Court Cost: $ 3,908.18

Other Cost: $ 1029.54

Total DUE:  $44,171.01

Nine years of compounding interest and fees can really add up 

on an unsecured CREDIT CARD in default!

So Coastal Federal Credit Union attorneys "coincidently" levies on my business banking account at the beginining of the month just before my mortgage check is scheduled to clear. BB&T Bank repeatedly returns the mortgage check even though my posted balance is high enough to clear the mortgage.

Notice that the Administrative Hold is for $44,296.01?  Well, BB&T Bank charges $125.00 to extort me out of all of my money. So $44,171.01 + $125.00 = $44,296.01

I have been an accountholder with Branch Banking and Trust Company (BB&T) Bank for over a decade. I would have appreciated a phone call or at least, received a notice in my online banking inbox about the levy against my account.

However, as you can see, BB&T did NOT attempt to personally notify me through my online banking inbox of the Coastal Federal Credit Union's levy against my business banking account. My last inbox message from BB and T Bank was from March 2016.

Actually, BB&T Bank just casually dropped me a letter in the US Postal Mail.  It was NOT certified, and it was delayed in arriving to me.

The Branch Banking and Trust Company letter essentially says that

• We are taking all your money out of your account.
• We are taking all additional deposits that you make to your account.
• We are charging you a non-refundable fee of $125.00 onto your account
• and call us if we can be of further assistance!

With this kind of customer service surrounding "real accounts," I hope that BB&T doesn't have any "fake accounts."

So what type of customer was I?  My business account was very dynamic.  It had its "highs and lows."

For instance, I was two cents ($.02) SHORT, and BB&T charged me a $36.00 overdraft fee.  I did not even complain.  I did not even ask for a credit nor refund.

Notice my posted balance is negative $36.02?  I was two cents short plus short their $36.00 overdraft fee for a total of -$36.02.  This is how BB&T bank does business.

Also, notice my posted balance on 10/7/2016 was $1,989.35 while my posted balance on 10/5/2016 was $1,474.35. So again, my business account was revolving with deposits and withdraws.

So now, my account has been levied for $2,114.35 which is MORE than my posted balance.

And my new BB&T account balance is still in the negative.  -$197.00 

Well, that's better than the -$42K!!!

Is this all legal?  I am asking the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the National Credit Union Administration  (NCUA) each this very question.

These "loan sharks" ( I mean) bank and credit union seem to be more ruthless the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).  At least, the IRS never takes one's last dime.  They leave a little money for people to live with. Why don't banks and credit unions follow the same courtesy or rules?

J. Randal Hall Denies Motion for Temporary Restraining Order

Schmitt versus Reimer et al (cv 110-102)

Judge J. Randal Hall denied Mark Schmitt's emergency motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction on September 14, 2010. Footnote 3 states " For instance, the Court notes that Judge Craig has asserted the defense of judicial immunity, which may serve as a complete bar to all claims against him. "

My layman's understanding is that Judge Craig contended that he was virtually and literally "untouchable" in 2010. 

He is due for re-election for another 8 year term this year (2016.)  He is running uncontested.  Surely, God will not let this happen.

I have been told by a few people that the FBI and US Marshalls have overlooked accusations surrounding Judge Craig countless times. Some are in disbelief that he is still in power.

The #exonerateMichael campaign has focused on Judge Daniel Craig because he was the District Attorney responsible for the false imprisonment of Michael C. Blocker.  

I suspect that Judge Daniel Craig influenced another North Carolina judge to make me a "pet project."  I have not secured the name of the local NC judge that signed off on the writ of execution and the latest series of extortion attempts against my assets.  However, I will count on the FBI to finish connecting the dots.

Regardless, if my suspicions are correct or not,  I am making room for a new best friend. (A safe.)

Photo credit:  www.citizenshipper.com

Coastal Federal Credit Union: Membership does not guarantee Friendship!

BB and T Available Balance: Negative $42,785.66

Most of my associates first responses to my new negative account balance was:

• Damn!!!
• Holy Shit!
• ooooJesus!
• Wow!
• "Where did you find that picture?"  (Answer: It is a screenshot of my actual BB and T Banking Account.)

So How did my account become -$42K?

In July 2007, Coastal Federal Credit Union had a judgement filed against me because I became unable to pay a credit card debt.  I regret that my software engineering salary was a thing of the past and now, as a hairdresser in a declining hairdressing market, I was unable to maintain all my financial obligations. I respect Coastal Federal Credit Union's position to protect its members' assets, but they must remember that I am also a member according to their roster. My account is dormant, but I am still a member.

So Coastal Federal Credit Union assigns their attorneys to collect on my $20K+ credit card balance.

This judgement was set to expire at a ten year point around July 2017, but the attorneys turned the judgement into a writ of execution which may extend the collection window to 20 years. I have no problem with this, but here is where the problem comes in:

The original levy (administrative HOLD) on my BB and T bank account on October 3, 2016 was for my EXACT posted balance plus an extra $125. ($1,005.72 +$125 = $1,030.72)

So apparently, someone at BB and T bank was providing my private and personal banking information to conspire and to extort me out of all of my monies in my account. Otherwise, in my opinion, the first documented levy amount should have been independent of my balance.

Further proof that the original levy was not $44,296.01 was because on October 4, 2016, a routine draft from American Express cleared my bank account for around $18.62 and a BB and T $36 Overdraft fee was applied.

However, at some time on October 4, 2016, the bank levy changed from $1,130.72 to $44,296.01.

BB and T Bank owes me some answers.  They have been very courteous this week in refunding some of the return and overdraft fees, and I anticipate that they will investigate this complaint as soon as possible.

In addition, the IRS never "takes people's last penny" out of their account so how can a credit card collection effort empty out a bank account?  North Carolina laws require a nine day hold. 10/3/2016 plus 9 days equals 10/12/2016.  However, the $44k levy did not update until 10/4/2016.  So why didn't the pending date adjust with the levy amount to reflect 10/13/16?

I have been overseeing the #exonerateMichael campaign to free my first cousin from false imprisonment in Georgia.  The circle of judges and attorneys in Augusta, GA that I have identified as showing prosecutorial misconduct have been accused of getting people fired, blackballed, and evicted for crossing paths with them.  

Do I believe that my prison reform effort in Augusta, Georgia has anything to do with this vicious attack on my business banking account?  

Well, you tell me.