Did Presiding Judge oversee constitutional rights stolen?

The presiding judge admitted that Mr. Blocker's alleged rape charge could carry a LIFE sentence which makes case 2007RCCR 00181 a CAPITAL FELONY case.  

Also, according to Code section 17-7-95 - a capital felony - a nolo contendere is unlawful.

Mr. Blocker was detained in jail for a whole year waiting for a FAIR TRIAL by Jury.  His day finally came.  The Jury was charged and his trial went into day three.

Public Defender Hugh Hadden confirms three days of trial. "I think what we must have done is pick the jury on Monday which would have been February 14th."  Where are those "trial transcripts" anyway?  NO ONE seems to KNOW!  BECAUSE the trial began January 14, 2008.  Does anyone care anything about facts, law, and constitutional rights?

So, on the third day of trial, Mr. Blocker who admits to being medicated as noted in his sentencing transcript, was tricked into signing what he understood as a plea deal for burglary by MULTIPLE Public Defenders PRESENT besides Hugh Hadden.

So all of these licensed attorneys including the judge watched a man facing a CAPITAL Felony have his CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to a FAIR TRIAL by JURY STOLEN.  These practicing attorneys INTERFERED with the Due process of LAW (Fifth Amendment) in the middle of a FAIR TRIAL by JURY in a Capital Felony case?

This INJUSTICE needs to be corrected as soon as possible AND those responsible should be formally corrected.

#exonerateMichael